4.7 Article

Quality control of spectroscopic data in non-targeted analysis-Development of a multivariate control chart

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108601

关键词

Standardisation; Quality assurance; Fourier transform-midinfrared spectroscopy; Fingerprinting; Outlier score-based algorithms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a workflow based on the evaluation of a quality control sample in non-targeted analysis for outlier detection and time related trend is proposed for the first time. The novel concept was tested using Fourier transform-midinfrared spectroscopy with rapeseed oil as the quality control sample, achieving best results with outlier score-based methods. Different data evaluation strategies were compared and the models were challenged by varying conditions to verify their applicability in identifying outliers.
In the presented study, an easy to implement workflow based on the evaluation of a quality control sample in non-targeted analysis (outlier detection and time related trend) is proposed for the first time. The novel concept was developed and demonstrated with Fourier transform-midinfrared spectroscopy using a rapeseed oil as quality control sample. Different data evaluation strategies for outlier detection were tested and compared: (i) principal component analysis (PCA), (ii) PCA combined with Hotelling's T-squared distribution and Q-residuals for data assessment as well as (iii) various outlier score-based methods. The build models were challenged by varying measurement and storage conditions to verify the applicability of the three evaluation types (i-iii) to identify these artificially induced variations as outliers. Analogous to a control chart in targeted analysis warning and action limits (numerical decision criteria) were calculated using outlier score-based methods. The best results were achieved by the four outlier score-based methods (pre-period n = 25), where 100 % of the deliberately generated outliers were identified as such.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据