4.7 Article

Rapid determination of metanil yellow in turmeric using a molecularly imprinted polymer dispersive solid-phase extraction and visible light spectrophotometry

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 380, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132120

关键词

Azo dye; Metanil yellow; MIP; Solid-phase extraction; Turmeric

资金

  1. Vice-chancellor for Research and Technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences [9809056518]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study developed a sensitive and available method for determining metanil yellow as an adulterating agent in food samples. The method involved solid-phase extraction and UV-spectrophotometric determination, showing successful results in determining the content of metanil yellow. Through optimized extraction process and selective extraction polymers, the method demonstrated selective extraction of metanil yellow and achieved high recovery rates in the samples.
The present study aimed to develop a sensitive and available method for determining metanil yellow (MY) as an adulterating agent in food samples. Solid-phase extraction was chosen for pre-concentrating metanil yellow prior to its determination using a validated UV-spectrophotometric method. The precipitation polymerization method was applied to synthesize a range of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for selective extraction of MY. Polymers were characterized by SEM and FTIR and investigated for MY extraction through batch rebinding experiments. The extraction process was optimized in the term of pH, time, capacity, and the desorbing solvent. Results of this study showed the critical role of template/functional monomer ratio in the preparation of the MIPs. The developed MIP solid-phase extraction/UV-spectrophotometric method was employed for determining MY in spiked samples and showed 88.10-92.76% recovery for turmeric samples containing 0.1-10 mg/kg MY. The developed method was shown selective for MY in the presence of another azo dye.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据