4.7 Article

Characterization of the aroma profiles of oolong tea made from three tea cultivars by both GC-MS and GC-IMS

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 376, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131933

关键词

Aroma profiles; Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrom-etry (GC-IMS); Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC– MS); Odor activity value (OAV); Oolong tea; Tea cultivar

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32072634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the aroma characteristics of oolong teas made from Shuixian, Huangmeigui, and Zimudan tea cultivars. Huangmeigui and Zimudan teas had more volatile compounds and stronger floral aroma compared to Shuixian tea, with unique notes of popcorn, creamy, and caramel-like odors. The use of GC-IMS allowed the identification of additional volatile compounds, highlighting the benefits of a combined method for understanding the impact of cultivars on tea aroma profiles.
Tea cultivar is crucial for oolong tea aroma quality. However, the aroma characteristics of oolong tea made from different cultivars have rarely been studied. The aroma profiles of fresh tea leaves and oolong teas derived from Shuixian (SX), Huangmeigui (HMG) and Zimudan (ZMD) cultivars were comprehensively analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), sensory evaluation and odor activity value (OAV) determination. 12 volatiles (OAV>1) contributed to the overall aroma, of which benzeneacetaldehyde (OAV 2.14) and 3,5-diethyl-2-methylpyrazine (OAV 1.25) were the aroma-active compounds for HMG tea. Significantly more volatiles and stronger floral odor were from HMG and ZMD than the SX tea. Moreover, popcorn-like, creamy odors with high-intensity, and caramel-like odor were only recorded in HMG and ZMD samples. Additionally, 27 volatiles were identified by GC-IMS only, indicating the benefits of combined method for a better understanding of the impact of cultivars on tea aroma profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据