4.7 Article

Effects of food matrix elements (dietary fibres) on grapefruit peel flavanone profile and on faecal microbiota during in vitro fermentation

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 371, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131065

关键词

Flavanones; Dietary fibre; Grapefruit; Dihydrocaffeic acid; Colonic fermentation; Gut microbiota

资金

  1. Key R & D projects of Jiangxi Province [20192ACB60006]
  2. Key R & D projects of Nanchang metropolis [2019-NC2DSY-002]
  3. Postdoctoral Fund of Jiangxi [2020KY25]
  4. Special Fund for Postgraduate Innovation [CX2019099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that pectin, konjac, and chitosan can increase the content of low-molecular-weight metabolites in grapefruit peel, and that high-viscosity food matrices (such as konjac and chitosan) have a significant impact on gut microbiota during simulated colonic fermentation. Dietary fibers can retain flavanones in grapefruit peel.
Citrus fruits are a good source of flavanones. The present study aimed to assess the effect of food matrix elements [dietary fibres (DFs)] on the flavanone profile of grapefruit peel (GFP) and on the gut microbiota during in vitro digestion and simulated colonic fermentation. The contents of low-molecular-weight metabolites (dihydrocaffeic acid and 3-phenylpropionic acid) were increased by pectin, konjac and chitosan in medium- and high-viscosity matrices. Compared with the GFP group, the counts of Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium leptum were significantly increased in medium-viscosity food matrices (konjac and chitosan) (p < 0.05). Moreover, the acetic and propionic acid contents were significantly elevated in the GFP + DF groups after 12 h of fermentation (p < 0.05). GFP flavanones were retained by DF, and the total phenolic content (TPC) and antioxidant potency composite (APC) index decreased during in vitro digestion. These findings indicate that medium-viscosity DFs (konjac and chitosan) could act as key food matrix elements for the retention of polyphenols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据