4.7 Article

Geographical authentication of virgin olive oil by GC-MS sesquiterpene hydrocarbon fingerprint: Verifying EU and single country label-declaration

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 378, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132104

关键词

Virgin Olive Oil; Authenticity; Geographical origin; Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons; Fingerprint; SPME-GC-MS; PLS-DA

资金

  1. European Commission [635690]
  2. project AUTENFOOD, from ACCI 'O-Generalitat de Catalunya
  3. European Union through the ERDF programme [COMRDI-15-1-0035]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [FPU16/01744, RYC-2017-23601]
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (Spain) [2020FI_B00595]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the report from the EU Food Fraud Network, olive oil is one of the most reported products. A classification model based on chemical fingerprint was developed to distinguish between EU and non-EU olive oils, achieving a high accuracy rate.
According to the last report from the European Union (EU) Food Fraud Network, olive oil tops the list of the most notified products. Current EU regulation states geographical origin as mandatory for virgin olive oils, even though an official analytical method is still lacking. Verifying the compliance of label-declared EU oils should be addressed with the highest priority level. Hence, the present work tackles this issue by developing a classification model (PLS-DA) based on the sesquiterpene hydrocarbon fingerprint of 400 samples obtained by HS-SPME-GC-MS to discriminate between EU and non-EU olive oils, obtaining an 89.6% of correct classification for the external validation (three iterations), with a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.95. Subsequently, multi-class discrimination models for EU and non-EU countries were developed and externally validated (with three different validation sets) with successful results (average of 92.2% of correct classification for EU and 96.0% for non-EU countries).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据