4.7 Article

Thermoplastic starch blown films functionalized by plasticized nitrite blended with PBAT for superior oxygen barrier and active biodegradable meat packaging

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 374, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131709

关键词

Food packaging; Active packaging; Film; Biodegradable; Pork; Antimicrobial; Advanced material; Shelf-life

资金

  1. Program Management Unit Competitiveness (PMUC)
  2. Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council (NXPO), Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional bioplastic packaging was successfully produced by modifying thermoplastic starch with nitrite and polybutylene adipate terephthalate. The use of nitrite improved the properties of the packaging film and effectively improved and stabilized the quality of vacuum-packaged pork during a 12-day storage period.
Functional bioplastic packaging was produced from thermoplastic starch (TPS) with nitrite (1-5%) and polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) (PBAT/TPS at 30/70 and 40/60) via blown-film extrusion. TPS-nitrite interaction increased thermal destabilization and decreased alpha-relaxation temperature of TPS phase, indicating improved plasticization and disruption of starch granules. Nitrite modified C=O bonding of PBAT and improved compatibility with TPS networks, resulting in compact microstructures that reduced oxygen and water vapor permeability. Films containing nitrite showed up to 39.7% decrease (p<0.05) in mechanical properties while effectively improving and stabilizing redness of vacuum-packaged pork during storage for 12 days. Nitrite release led to up to 0.66 ppm residual nitrite, which corresponded to formation of nitrosyl myoglobin (3.4-9.6 ppm), and effectively reduced total viable count, lactic acid bacteria and yeast and molds (p<0.05). Stabilized lipid components also increased with increasing nitrite. Novel nitrite-containing biodegradable film enhanced functional properties and retained quality of packaged meat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据