4.7 Article

Improvement of pasting and gelling behaviors of waxy maize starch by partial gelatinization and freeze-thawing treatment with xanthan gum

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 375, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131656

关键词

Waxy maize starch; Xanthan gum; Partial gelatinization; Freeze-thawing; Interaction; Pasting property; Gelling behaviors

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (IPET program) [119031-3]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200926]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M671627]
  4. Jiangsu Province Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020Z326]
  5. Shuangchuang Doctor Talent Support Program of Jiangsu Province
  6. Lvyangjinfeng Talent Support Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After partial gelatinization and freeze-thawing treatment, the structure and stability of waxy maize starch granules were altered, resulting in increased pasting viscosity and improved gel properties. The addition of xanthan gum further enhanced these effects.
To improve the pasting and gelling behaviors of waxy maize starch, an aqueous dispersion with or without xanthan gum was subjected to partial gelatinization (5 celcius above the onset melting temperature of starch) and freeze-thawing treatment. After the treatments, starch granules were slightly deformed, with partial loss of birefringence, and tended to aggregate. The relative crystallinity and thermal stability of waxy maize starch crystals decreased by the treatments. These changes indicated that the treatment affected the inner structure and chain arrangement of the granules. The treated waxy maize starches, however, showed a higher overall pasting viscosity with shorter and more cohesive pastes than that of the native starch. The treated starches formed rigid gels with increased stability against freeze-thawing. The addition of small amounts of xanthan gum enhanced the effects of the treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据