4.7 Article

A non-destructive sampling method for food authentication using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry or ion mobility spectrometry

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 373, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131540

关键词

Dry-cured Iberia n ham; HS-GC -MS; HS-GC-IMS; Acorn-fed; Feed-f e d; Non-destructive sampling

资金

  1. PIF scholarship of Universidad de Sevilla [VIPPIT-2019-IV.3, VIPPIT-2020-II.3]
  2. Sociedad Cooperativa Andaluza Ganadera del Valle de los Pedroches (COVAP)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  4. Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucia 2014-2020, convocatoria 2018

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that using GC-MS or GC-IMS techniques combined with nondestructive sampling methods for identification of dry-cured Iberian ham is feasible. HS-GC-IMS is more sensitive than HS-GC-MS, detecting more compounds and providing accurate qualitative results. Principal component analysis identified potential markers for differentiation.
The study of volatile compounds obtained by gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) or ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) may be very useful to protect food quality, especially when using a nondestructive sampling method. In this work, the authentication of the highly appreciated dry-cured Iberian ham by those techniques was studied and compared. The results obtained show the suitability of a nondestructive sampling method coupled to headspace sampling (HS)-GC-IMS or HS-GC-MS to determine volatile markers in the feeding Iberian pig regime. Although both methods were suitable to differentiate the ham categories, HS-GC-IMS was more sensitive detecting a higher number of compounds than HS-GC-MS, which provided accurate qualitative results. The results of principal component analysis showed that ethanol, 2-propanol and 3methylbutanol, identified by HS-GC-IMS, and 3-methylbutanal and heptane, identified by HS-GC-MS, could be considered potential markers to identify ham from different feeding regimes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据