4.7 Article

Identification and comparison of umami-peptides in commercially available dry-cured Spanish mackerels (Scomberomorus niphonius)

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 380, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132175

关键词

Umami-enhancing effect; Ligand-receptor interactions; Molecular mechanism; Umami receptor

资金

  1. National Key R& D Program of China [2018YFD0901003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901814]
  3. S & T Special Projects from the Department of Rural Agriculture of Guangdong Province, China [2020KJ136-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified and compared umami peptides from eight commercial dry-cured Spanish mackerels via molecular simulation. The results showed that the sequence of peptides varied in different samples, with only ten sequences being repeated across multiple samples. Four peptides were found to exhibit umami taste and umami-enhancing effects, forming hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic bonds in ligand-receptor interactions.
Dry-cured Spanish mackerel (DSM; Scomberomorus niphonius) is a popularity worldwide dry-cured marine fish product due to its salty and umami flavor. Umami peptides from eight commercial DSMs were identified and compared, and their molecular mechanisms were evaluated via molecular simulation. The results showed that the sequence of peptides varied in different DSMs, wherein only ten sequences were repeated across multiple samples and the remaining 19 were detected in only one sample. The sensory characteristics of eight repeated peptides were evaluated, and four were found to exhibit umami taste and umami-enhancing effects, including Arg-Asp, Asp-Gly-Val, Asp-Arg, and Asp-Lys. They all had a strong affinity for umami receptors, and several amino acid residues of the receptors were mobilized as binding sites to form hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic bonds in ligand-receptor interactions. These results indicated that DSM was rich in umami and umami-enhancing peptides, but their sequence were different in different DSMs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据