4.7 Article

Identification of polyphenols from Rosa roxburghii Tratt pomace and evaluation of in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 377, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131922

关键词

Rosa roxburghii; Pomace; Phenolics; Antioxidant activity; Caenorhabditis elegans

资金

  1. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [202102020267]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2020ZYGXZR021]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong, China [2021A0505020018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rosa roxburghii Tratt pomace (RRTP) was extracted to obtain free and bound phenolic fractions, which showed dose-dependent scavenging of radicals and improved survival rates in paraquat-exposed nematodes by enhancing SOD and CAT activities. These results suggest RRTP as a good and cost-effective source of natural antioxidants.
Rosa roxburghii Tratt pomace (RRTP) has increasingly attracted attention due to its various nutritional ingredients and health benefits. In this study, the free phenolic fraction (RRTP-FPF) and bound phenolic fraction (RRTP-BPF) were extracted from RRTP by solvent extraction method and alkaline hydrolysis method, respectively. The composition of polyphenols in RRTP-FPF and RRTP-BPF were identified by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography equipped with an electrospray ionization and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS). In vitro antioxidant assays indicated that RRTP-FPF and RRTP-BPF could scavenge radicals in a dose-dependent manner, and RRTP-BPF exhibited better scavenging activity than RRTP-FPF. In addition, RRTP-FPF and RRTP-BPF (20 similar to 100 mu g/mL) treatment for 24 h could significantly increase the survival rate and decrease reactive oxygen species (ROS) level of paraquat-exposed nematodes through improving the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). These results suggest that RRTP could be as a good and cheap source of natural antioxidants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据