4.6 Review

Impact of structural dynamics on biological functions of flaviviruses

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 290, 期 8, 页码 1973-1985

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.16419

关键词

antibody-dependent enhancement; envelope protein; flavivirus; membrane fusion; particle dynamics; particle heterogeneity; tick-borne encephalitis virus; virus breathing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flaviviruses, transmitted by mosquitoes or ticks, are important human pathogens. Research has shown that these viruses use a "breathing" mechanism to enhance their adaptability and replication through interactions with the immune system and host factors, and a novel mechanism of antibody-mediated infection enhancement has been identified.
Flaviviruses comprise a number of mosquito- or tick-transmitted human pathogens of global public health importance. Advances in structural biology techniques have contributed substantially to our current understanding of the life cycle of these small enveloped RNA viruses and led to deep insights into details of virus assembly, maturation and cell entry. In addition to large-scale conformational changes and oligomeric rearrangements of envelope proteins during these processes, there is increasing evidence that smaller-scale protein dynamics (referred to as virus breathing) can confer extra flexibility to these viruses for the fine-tuning of their interactions with the immune system and possibly with cellular factors they encounter in their complex ecological cycles in arthropod and vertebrate hosts. In this review, we discuss how work with tick-borne encephalitis virus has extended our view on flavivirus breathing, leading to the identification of a novel mechanism of antibody-mediated infection enhancement and demonstrating breathing intermediates of the envelope protein in the process of membrane fusion. These data are discussed in the context of other flaviviruses and the perspective of a potential role of virus breathing to cope with the requirements of adaptation and replication in evolutionarily very different hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据