3.9 Article

A role for hypnosis in cataract surgery: Report of 171 procedures

期刊

JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 287-291

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.04.024

关键词

Hypnosis; Cataract surgery; Ambulatiry; Intraoperative intravenous medication; Anesthesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. To study the effectiveness of relaxation hypnosis in outpatient cataract surgery. Study design. Prospective study of 171 patients undergoing cataract surgery under hypnosis, performed by the same nurse anesthetist. The procedures were performed by 2 senior surgeons, A and B (A=78 surgeries, and B = 93 surgeries) under topical anesthesia and with a 2.2-mm mini incision. The hypnosis group (n = 102) was compared to a control group (n = 69) according to quantitative, objective criteria: hemodynamic changes and the need for intravenous medication in operating room, as well as subjective, qualitative criteria: surgical comfort, effectiveness of hypnosis, and patient satisfaction. Subgroup analyses by surgeon, 1st and 2nd eye surgery, were performed. Results. Hemodynamic parameters were not significantly different between the 2 groups: systolic blood pressure (P=0.06) and maximum heart rate (P=0.25). However, the use of intraoperative intravenous medication was significantly higher in the control group (49.3% versus 21.6%, P < 0.001). The effectiveness of relaxation was scored at a mean of 5.25/6 by the nurse anesthetist. The patients in the hypnosis group reported a mean comfort rating of 8.4/10, and 100% were satisfied with this hypnosis experience. Conclusions. Preliminary results of this study are very positive for all three parties: patient/anesthetist/surgeon. They are leading to an expanded university training program for operating room personnel in order to improve quality of care and reduce premedication in elderly patients so as to facilitate their return to home. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据