4.7 Article

Concept drift modeling for robust autonomous vehicle control systems in time-varying traffic environments

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116206

关键词

Concept drift learning; Time-varying environments; Autonomous vehicle systems; Traffic control; Automated material handling systems

资金

  1. Academic Promotion System of Korea Polytechnic University
  2. Kwangwoon University
  3. MIST (Ministry of Science and ICT) , under the National Program for Excellence in SW [2017-0-00096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduced a concept drift modeling framework for a robust vehicle control system, which combines a drift-adaptation learning technique with a drift detector, and high-fidelity simulations based on actual data confirmed its superiority.
Autonomous vehicle systems (AVSs) are widely used to transfer wafers in semiconductor manufacturing. However, in such systems, robust traffic control is a significant challenge because all vehicles must be monitored and controlled in real time to cope with traffic congestion. Several predictive approaches have been proposed to prevent traffic congestion in stationary traffic environments. However, in real-life traffic situations, concept drifts exist, which are characterized by time-varying traffic conditions that hinder the accurate prediction of congestion. In this study, we propose a concept drift modeling framework for a robust vehicle control system. The proposed method combines a drift-adaptation learning technique with a drift detector to achieve adaptive traffic prediction in time-varying AVSs. We compare the effectiveness of the prediction and efficiency of model updates with representative methods. High-fidelity simulations based on actual data confirm that the proposed method outperforms alternative methods by detecting change patterns and updating prediction models whenever significant concept drifts occur in traffic patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据