4.7 Article

Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA): A nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116158

关键词

Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA); Optimization algorithms; Meta-heuristics; Real-word problems; Optimization problems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper introduces a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer, RSA, based on the hunting behavior of crocodiles. Through implementing two main steps of crocodile behavior, RSA shows unique search methods compared to existing algorithms, and achieves better results in various test functions and engineering problems.
This paper proposes a novel nature-inspired meta-heuristic optimizer, called Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA), motivated by the hunting behaviour of Crocodiles. Two main steps of Crocodile behaviour are implemented, such as encircling, which is performed by high walking or belly walking, and hunting, which is performed by hunting coordination or hunting cooperation. The mentioned search methods of the proposed RSA are unique compared to other existing algorithms. The performance of the proposed RSA is evaluated using twenty-three classical test functions, thirty CEC2017 test functions, ten CEC2019 test functions, and seven real-world engineering problems. The obtained results of the proposed RSA are compared to various existing optimization algorithms in the literature. The results of the tested three benchmark functions revealed that the proposed RSA achieved better results than the other competitive optimization algorithms. The results of the Friedman ranking test proved that the RSA is a significantly superior method than other comparative methods. Finally, the results of the examined engineering problems showed that the RSA obtained better results compared to other various methods. Source codes of RSA are publicly available at https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/101385-reptile-search-algorithm-rsa-anature-inspired-optimizer

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据