4.5 Article

The detrimental impact of elevated Ferritin to Iron ratio on in-hospital prognosis of patients with COVID-19

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 469-478

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2022.2052047

关键词

COVID-19; ferritin; ferritin to iron ratio; inflammation; iron; SARS-CoV-2

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of serum ferritin-to-iron ratio (FIR) on the prognosis of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The findings showed that higher FIR values were associated with more severe symptoms and increased risk of ICU admission/in-hospital death.
Background Acute viral infections, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), are characterized by the dysregulation of iron metabolism, resulting in high serum ferritin and low iron levels. Research design and methods This study aimed to evaluate the prospective impact of iron metabolism dysregulation, as expressed by serum Ferritin-to-Iron Ratio (FIR), on the in-hospital prognosis of patients with COVID-19. Serum levels of ferritin and iron, as well as other iron metabolism markers and recognized prognostic indicators of COVID-19 severity, were measured in 362 patients consecutively hospitalized for COVID-19. The prospective relationship between FIR and the risk of the composite outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) admission/in-hospital death was analyzed. Results In the population examined (mean age 74 +/- 15 years, males 55%), the rates of radiographic signs of pneumonia, respiratory distress, and the need for noninvasive ventilation were higher in patients with high FIR (>= 29.2, the 75(th) percentile) than in those with low FIR (<29.2, the 75(th) percentile) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). High FIR was associated with a 1.7-fold (HR 1.709, 95% CI 1.017-2.871, p = 0.043) higher risk of ICU admission/in-hospital death. Conclusions Increasing FIR values significantly and independently predicts worse in-hospital prognosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据