4.5 Article

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of TQC3564, a novel CRTh2 receptor antagonist: report of the first-in-human single- and multiple-dose escalation trials in healthy Chinese subjects

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 729-736

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2078192

关键词

TQC3564; pharmacokinetics; safety; CRTh2 receptor antagonist; asthma

资金

  1. Capital Construction Funds within the provincial budget in 2020 (Innovation Capacity Construction) [2020C038-1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82104314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This first-in-human study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of TQC3564 in healthy Chinese subjects. The results showed that TQC3564 was safe and well tolerated, without dose-dependent adverse events. The study demonstrated the potential of TQC3564 as a therapeutic option for asthma.
Background: This is the first-in-human study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of TQC3564 (a novel CRTh2 receptor antagonist) in healthy Chinese subjects. Research design and methods: This project was a phase Ia clinical study of TQC3564 as a single-ascending dose (SAD) (25 to 1200 mg) and a multiple-ascending dose (MAD) (100 or 500 mg, QD) as well as a two-period crossover food-effect study (300 mg). Results: In the SAD and MAD study, TQC3564 were found to be safe and well tolerated, without dose-dependent adverse events (AEs), and all AEs were mild or moderate in severity. In the SAD study, the median t(max) of TQC3564 was 2.5-4.5 h, and t(1/2) was 8.13-35.7 h. Exposure was increased after food intake. The MAD study results showed that steady-state was achieved on day 4. Moreover, no apparent TQC3564 plasma accumulation was detected on day 7. Conclusions: In healthy subjects, TQC3564 at a single dose of 25-1200 mg or 100-500 mg at multiple doses (QD) was safe and tolerable with acceptable PK profiles, indicating that TQC3564 has potential as a therapeutic option for asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据