4.7 Article

Re-evaluation of the hCMEC/D3 based in vitro BBB model for ABC transporter studies

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2022.02.017

关键词

Blood-brain barrier; hCMEC; D3; In vitro BBB model; ABC transporters; Uptake; Validation; Transwell

资金

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) [807015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The blood-brain barrier poses a major challenge for CNS drug delivery due to its low permeability. This study evaluated the expression of ABC transporters in the hCMEC/D3 human cell line and found that it is suitable for screening drug candidates using regular uptake assays, but is limited in transcellular permeability studies due to insufficient tight junctions.
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) represents one of the biggest hurdles for CNS related drug delivery, preventing permeation of most molecules, and therefore poses a major challenge for researchers in finding effective treatments for CNS diseases. The low permeability of molecules through the BBB is linked on one hand to the extreme tightness by tight junction (TJ) formation limiting the paracellular transport, and on the other hand to the presence of ATP-driven ef �ux pumps which actively transport unwanted compounds out of the brain. In this study we evaluated the applicability of the immortalized human cell line hCMEC/D3 for ABC transporter studies, focusing on the most expressed ABC transporters at the human BBB: P-glycoprotein (PGP, ABCB1), multidrug resistance protein 4 (MRP4, ABCC4) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP, ABCG2). Therefore, a two-step screening method was applied, consisting of a regular uptake assay (96-well format) and bidirectional transport studies, using a transwell system as in vitro simulation of the human BBB. In conclusion, the hCMEC/D3 based in vitro BBB model is well suited to screen drug candidates for ABC transporter interactions on the basis of a regular uptake assay, but in terms of transcellular permeability studies the cell line is limited by a lack of sufficient junctional tightness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据