4.5 Article

Enantioselective Synthesis of Spirocyclopentane Oxindoles Bearing Five Consecutive Stereocenters through Secondary Amine-Catalyzed [3+2] Cycloaddition

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2022, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.202200489

关键词

Asymmetric synthesis; Five consecutive stereocenters; Michael; Michael cascade reaction; Secondary amine-catalyzed; Spirocyclopentane oxindoles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82073998, 22107015]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2021YFS0044, 2022JDRC0125]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a newly designed strategy for a Michael-initiated ring-closing [3+2] cycloaddition reaction between 3-(1-benzyl-2-oxoindolin-3-yl)pentane-2,4-diones and alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes. The reaction, catalyzed by a chiral secondary amine, efficiently produces highly functionalized spirocyclopentane oxindole derivatives with five consecutive stereogenic centers, including two tetrasubstituted carbons. The desired products are obtained with high yields, excellent enantioselectivities, and diastereoselectivities. Furthermore, this strategy demonstrates practicality through gram-scale experiments and a series of synthetic transformations.
This work delineates a Michael-initiated ring-closing [3+2] cycloaddition of newly designed 3-(1-benzyl-2-oxoindolin-3-yl)pentane-2,4-diones with alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes. During the chiral secondary amine-catalyzed cascade reaction, highly functionalized spirocyclopentane oxindole derivatives containing five consecutive stereogenic centers were formed, two of which were tetrasubstituted carbon. All the desired products are smoothly obtained in good yields (up to 90 %) with excellent enantioselectivities (up to >99 : 1 er) and diastereoselectivities (up to >95 : 5 dr). Meanwhile, the practicality of this strategy was highlighted by the further gram-scale experiment and a set of synthetic transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据