4.7 Article

Bayesian ordinal regression for multiple criteria choice and ranking

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 299, 期 2, 页码 600-620

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.09.028

关键词

Decision analysis; Ordinal regression; Bayesian inference; Stochastic acceptability analysis; Additive value function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel Bayesian Ordinal Regression approach for multiple criteria choice and ranking problems. The approach utilizes an additive value function model to represent the Decision Maker's preferences in the form of pairwise comparisons. It applies the Bayesian rule to derive a posterior distribution over potential value functions and employs the Metropolis-Hastings method for summarizing the distribution and conducting robustness analysis.
We propose a novel Bayesian Ordinal Regression approach for multiple criteria choice and ranking problems. It employs an additive value function model to represent indirect Decision Maker's (DM's) preferences in the form of pairwise comparisons of reference alternatives. By defining a likelihood for the provided preference information and specifying a prior of the preference model, we apply the Bayesian rule to derive a posterior distribution over a set of all potential value functions, not necessarily compatible ones. This distribution emphasizes the potential differences in the abilities of these models to reconstruct the DM's pairwise comparisons. Hence a distinctive character of our approach consists of characterizing the uncertainty in consequence of applying indirect preference information. We also employ a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, called the Metropolis-Hastings method, to summarize the posterior distribution of the value function model and quantify the outcomes of robustness analysis in the form of stochastic acceptability indices. The proposed approach's performance is investigated in a thorough experimental study involving real-world and artificially generated datasets. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据