4.7 Article

Eliminating transplant waiting time inequities-With an application to kidney allocation in the USA

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 297, 期 3, 页码 977-985

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.09.033

关键词

OR in health services; Transplant waitlist; Equity; Allocation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the last three decades, inequities in waiting times for deceased donor organ transplantation, particularly kidney transplantation in the United States, have been addressed through formal modeling, analysis, and optimization using queuing models, network flows, and Rawls' Theory of Justice. By considering blood type incompatibilities and ethnic differences, the research has shown that current allocation policies can effectively reduce inequities in waiting time and transplant probability related to blood types.
Inequities in waiting times for deceased donor organ transplantation have received considerable atten-tion in the last three decades and have motivated allocation policy reforms. This holds particularly true for kidney transplantation in the United States, where more than 90,0 0 0 patients are wait listed and average waiting times vary considerably among patients from different blood types and ethnic groups. This research presents a novel approach to formally model, analyze, and optimize equity of transplant waiting times and probabilities using queuing models, network flows, and Rawls' Theory of Justice. The presented formal models address inequities resulting from blood type incompatibilities, which are inter-related to ethnic differences in patient and donor rates. Moreover, we present results of an application to the deceased donor kidney wait lists in the United States. The findings indicate that the allocation policies currently practiced red can virtually resolve blood type related inequities in average waiting time and transplant probability. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据