4.5 Article

Effectiveness of an Online Programme to Tackle Individual's Meat Intake through SElf-regulation (OPTIMISE): A randomised controlled trial

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 61, 期 5, 页码 2615-2626

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-022-02828-9

关键词

Self-regulation; Self-monitoring; Goal-setting; Meat intake; Meat reduction; Multi-component intervention

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust, Our Planet Our Health programme (Livestock, Environment and People-LEAP) [205212/Z/16/Z]
  2. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Oxford and Thames Valley NIHR Applied Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effectiveness of an online self-regulation intervention to reduce meat consumption. The intervention led to initial reductions in meat intake, but did not exceed the control group in the longer term.
Purpose A reduction in meat intake is recommended to meet health and environmental sustainability goals. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an online self-regulation intervention to reduce meat consumption. Methods One hundred and fifty one adult meat eaters were randomised 1:1 to a multi-component self-regulation intervention or an information-only control. The study lasted 9 weeks (1-week self-monitoring; 4-week active intervention; and 4-week maintenance phase). The intervention included goal-setting, self-monitoring, action-planning, and health and environmental feedback. Meat intake was estimated through daily questionnaires in weeks 1, 5 and 9. The primary outcome was change in meat consumption from baseline to five weeks. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline to nine weeks and change in red and processed meat intake. We used linear regression models to assess the effectiveness of all the above outcomes. Results Across the whole sample, meat intake was 226 g/day at baseline, 118 g/day at five weeks, and 114 g/day at nine weeks. At five weeks, the intervention led to a 40 g/day (95%CI - 11.6,- 67.5, P = 0.006) reduction in meat intake, including a 35 g/day (95%CI - 7.7, - 61.7, P = 0.012) reduction in red and processed meat, relative to control. There were no significant differences in meat reduction after the four-week maintenance phase (- 12 g/day intervention vs control, 95% CI 19.1, - 43.4, P = 0.443). Participants said the intervention was informative and eye-opening. Conclusion The intervention was popular among participants and helped achieve initial reductions in meat intake, but the longer-term reductions did not exceed control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据