4.7 Article

Exploring the structure-activity relationship of benzylidene-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one compared to benzofuran-3(2H)-one derivatives as inhibitors of tau amyloid fibers

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114139

关键词

Indanones; Aurones; Alzheimer's disease; Tau aggregation; AcPHF6 peptide

资金

  1. Labex Arcane
  2. CBH-EUR-GS [ANR-17-EURE-0003]
  3. NeuroCoG IDEX UGA [ANR-15IDEX-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tauopathies, such as Alzheimer's disease, are neurodegenerative diseases that require effective treatment. This study identified the importance of hydroxylation pattern in the activity of potential inhibitors. Additionally, the three-dimensional shape of the molecules determines their interaction mode with the target.
Tauopathies, such as Alzheimer's disease, have been the subject of several hypotheses regarding the way to treat them. Hyperphosphorylation of tau protein leading to its aggregation is widely recognized as a key step in the development of these diseases resulting in neuronal dysfunction. The AcPHF6 model of tau that includes the shorter critical fragment involved in the protein aggregation was used in vitro to identify new potential inhibitors. Following a previous study on aurone derivatives, we herein compare this polyphenol family to a very close one, the benzylidene-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one (also named indanone). The structure activity relationship studies bring to light the importance of the hydroxylation pattern in both series: the more hydroxylated, the more active. In addition, the three-dimensional shape of the molecules is involved in their interaction mode with their target, thus defining their role either as inhibitors of fiber elongation or as fiber-binding molecules. Indanone 13a was identified as a promising inhibitor: its activity was confirmed by circular dichroism and atomic force microscopy studies.(c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据