4.6 Review

Informed consent and biological agents in rheumatology and internal medicine

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13805

关键词

biological agents; informed consent; mental capacity; rheumatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reviewed the literature on biological agents and found that there were no specific studies addressing the issue of informed consent in patients receiving biological agents. However, the association between biological agents and serious infections or malignancies needs to be disclosed in the informed consent process, and ethical and clinical issues related to experimenting with new agents with potential serious adverse effects deserve attention.
Background The need for highly effective therapies in rheumatologic diseases has led to the widespread and growing use of a heterogeneous class of molecules called biological agents. The increasing experience with biological agents has raised concerns about safety and efficacy issues that need to be discussed in the informed consent acquisition process. Methods The authors performed a review of the literature on biological agents focusing on their most important characteristics concerning the informed consent procedures. Results No studies specifically addressed the issue of informed consent in patients receiving biological agents. Several studies reported data about off-label use of biological agents usually with no obvious attention to informed consent shortcomings. Conclusion The reported association between biological agents and serious infections or malignancies, including reactivation of latent tuberculosis, needs specific disclosure in informed consent acquisition, together with information about the possible efficacy in clinical contexts often characterized by resistance to previous treatments. Ethical and clinical issues bound to the need for experimenting with new agents with potentially serious adverse effects deserve specific attention. Studies aimed at evaluating mental capacity to consent in subjects receiving biological agents are required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据