4.7 Review

Polymer-based nanocarriers for vaginal drug delivery

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 53-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.12.004

关键词

Nanomedicine; Nanoparticles; Nanofibers; Mucus; Mucosal drug delivery; Mucosal vaccination; Vaginal microbicides; Gene silencing

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [SFRH/BPD/92934/2013, SFRH/BD/96519/2013]
  2. FCT [VIH/SAU/0021/2011]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  4. Portuguese funds through FCT [PEst-C/SAU/LA0002/2013]
  5. North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (ON.2 - O Novo Norte) project SAESCTN-PIIC&DT under the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/96519/2013, SFRH/BPD/92934/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vaginal delivery of various drugs is well described and its relevance established in current medical practice. Alongside recent advances and achievements in the fields of pharmaceutical nanotechnology and nanomedicine, there is an increasing interest in the potential use of different nanocarriers for the delivery of old and new pharmacologically active molecules with either therapeutic or prophylactic purposes. Nanosystems of polymeric nature in particular have been investigated over the last years and their interactions with mucosal fluids and tissues, as well as genital tract biodistribution upon vaginal administration, are now better understood. While different applications have been envisioned, most of the current research is focusing in the development of nanoformulations with the potential to inhibit the vaginal transmission of HIV upon sexual intercourse. The present work focuses its discussion on the potential and perils of polymer-based nanocarriers for the vaginal administration of different pharmacologically active molecules. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据