4.5 Review

Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT): past, present, and future

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01394-9

关键词

Schizophrenia; Psychosis; Cognitive biases; Metacognitive training; Social cognition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides an overview and retrospective on metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT), discussing its initial development and subsequent improvements and expansions. The efficacy of MCT in treating schizophrenia has been confirmed through meta-analyses, leading to its inclusion in national treatment guidelines. Efforts have also been made to enhance dissemination and accessibility through the creation of culturally sensitive language versions and e-learning courses.
This article provides an overview and retrospective on metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT), which first appeared approximately 2 decades ago. We recount how our empirical understanding of psychosis at that time led to the first preliminary version of the program. We describe setbacks and challenges that led to major changes, including revisions to existing modules (e.g., more focus on metacognitive variables, particularly on decision confidence as one of the primary targets of treatment) and the creation of new modules addressing mood, as well as attempts to improve sustainability of effects via homework exercises and a smartphone app (www.uke.de/mct_app). We have also enhanced dissemination efforts by creating new culturally sensitive language versions and facilitating low-threshold training through e-learning courses (www.uke. de/e-mct). Finally, we discuss several meta-analyses on the efficacy of MCT that have been published over the last decade. While reviews were initially inconsistent, possibly reflecting the insufficient statistical power and lower design quality of the first MCT studies, more recent meta-analyses have confirmed the efficacy of MCT on positive symptoms, insight, and cognitive biases, which has led to the inclusion of MCT in some national treatment guidelines for schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据