4.6 Article

Recent brachiopod diversity and distribution from the central Cantabrian Sea and the Avil′es Canyons System (Bay of Biscay)

期刊

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2022.107829

关键词

Present-day brachiopods; Brachiopoda; Biodiversity; Life habits; Biogeography

资金

  1. project DOSMARES (Proyecto Canones y taludes profundos en los Mares Cantabrico y Mediterraneo) [CTM2010-21810-C03-02]
  2. project COCACE (Campana Oceanografica del Cantabrico Central Hidroelectrica del Cantabrico S.A.)
  3. University of Oviedo [RES-14-CI-058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate understanding of species diversity in deep-sea ecosystems is crucial for protecting these environments. This study examined Brachiopoda samples from the Cantabrian Sea and Avile's Canyons System, providing insights into their ecology, distribution, and biogeographical history.
An accurate knowledge of the species diversity from deep-sea ecosystems is an imperative requirement in order to protect these environments in the context of global change and the biodiversity loss. We have examined the Brachiopoda samples collected during the COCACE (1987-88) and BIOCANT (2012-13) oceanographic cruises, from the central Cantabrian Sea and the Avile ' s Canyons System (ACS). The ACS is included in the Natura 2000 as a Site of Community Importance. Brachiopod specimens were collected from the continental shelf, slope and bathyal zones, ranging in deep from 117 to 4700 m. Nine hundred and thirty specimens belonging to 15 taxa (12 species and three subspecific varieties), in 12 families, were recognized. The species Dyscolia subquadrata is reported for the first time in the study area, constituting a new record from the Cantabrian Sea. We provide brief notes about the ecology and distribution of the collected species from the study area. Furthermore, we trace the biogeographical history of the involved species and review their main substrate and bio-depth zone preferences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据