4.7 Article

Investigation of the driving factors of ecological footprint in Malaysia

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 37, 页码 56814-56827

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19797-5

关键词

Economic growth; Malaysia; Ecological footprint; Capital investment; Energy consumption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the association between Malaysia's ecological footprint and its determinants such as economic growth, oil consumption, renewable energy, and domestic capital investment. The findings indicate that economic growth and oil consumption contribute to the ecological footprint, while renewable energy consumption and gross capital formation help reduce it.
Malaysia's growing trends in energy production-elated emissions throw doubt on the country's possibility of meeting the Paris Climate Change Agreement and SDG obligations. Taking into account Malaysia's current growth pattern and climatic circumstances, this study evaluates the association between ecological footprint and its potential determinants: economic growth, oil consumption, renewable energy and domestic capital investment for the period between 1965 and 2017. The stationary nature of the parameters is investigated using the conventional unit root approach (ADF and PP unit root) and structural break unit root (ZA unit root). The bounds approach in combination with the critical approximation p-values of Kripfganz and Schneider (2018) established a cointegration association between the observed parameters. The ARDL approach uncovered that economic growth and oil consumption contribute to ecological footprint. Furthermore, renewable energy consumption and gross capital formation reduce the ecological footprint. The FMOLS and DOLS estimators were applied as the sensitivity analysis of the ARDL estimators. Furthermore, the spectral BC causality approach was also utilized to investigate the causal association betweefataln ecological footprint and its determinants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据