4.7 Article

Climate regulation ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation are enhanced differently by climate- and fire-smart landscape management

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac64b5

关键词

carbon sequestration; climate change; ecosystem services; landscape planning; land-use change; mountain rural areas

资金

  1. Portuguese national funds through FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology [PCIF/MOG/0083/2017, CGL2017-89999-C2-2-R]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation - national funds by FCT [UIDB/04033/2020]
  3. Xunta de Galicia [ED481B2016/084-0]
  4. IACOBUS program (INTERREG V-A Espana-Portugal)
  5. POCTEP - Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [IJC2019-041033-I]
  6. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through PhD Grant [SFRH/BD/132838/2017]
  7. Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education
  8. European Social Fund-Operational Program Human Capital within the 2014-2020 EU
  9. Ramon y Cajal - Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RYC-2013-13979]
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PCIF/MOG/0083/2017, SFRH/BD/132838/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The implementation of climate-smart policies is encouraged worldwide to fight climate change. This study simulated the future effects of different land management strategies in the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Iberica and found that climate-smart policies are the most effective for climate regulation and protection of endangered species, while fire-smart policies also benefit carbon regulation and open-habitat species.
The implementation of climate-smart policies to enhance carbon sequestration and reduce emissions is being encouraged worldwide to fight climate change. Afforestation practices and rewilding initiatives are climate-smart examples suggested to tackle these issues. In contrast, fire-smart approaches, by stimulating traditional farmland activities or agroforestry practices, could also assist climate regulation while protecting biodiversity. However, there is scarce information concerning the potential impacts of these alternative land management strategies on climate regulation ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation. As such, this work simulates future effects of different land management strategies in the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Meseta Iberica (Portugal-Spain). Climate-smart ('Afforestation', 'Rewilding') and fire-smart ('Farmland recovery', 'Agroforestry recovery') scenarios were modelled over a period of 60 years (1990-2050), and their impacts on climate regulation services were evaluated. Species distribution models for 207 vertebrates were built and future gains/losses in climate-habitat suitability were quantified. Results suggest climate-smart policies as the best for climate regulation (0.98 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) of mean carbon sequestration increase and 6801.5 Meuro of avoided economic losses in 2020-2050 under Afforestation scenarios), while providing the largest habitat gains for threatened species (around 50% for endangered and critically endangered species under Rewilding scenarios). Fire-smart scenarios also benefit carbon regulation services (0.82 Mg C ha(-1) yr(-1) of mean carbon sequestration increase and 3476.3 Meuro of avoided economic losses in 2020-2050 under Agroforestry scenarios), benefiting the majority of open-habitat species. This study highlights the main challenges concerning management policies in European rural mountains, while informing decision-makers regarding landscape planning under global change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据