4.7 Article

Green space quality and adolescent mental health: do personality traits matter?

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112591

关键词

Green space quality; Adolescent; Mental health; Big five; Personality traits

资金

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) PPP Australian 2019 [57446380]
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  3. University of Wollongong
  4. NeuroSmog: Determining the impact of air pollution on the developing brain of the TEAM-NET programme of the Foundation for Polish Science - from EU from the European Regional Development Fund under the Smart Growth Operational Programme [POIR.04.04.00-1763/18-00]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council Boosting Dementia Research Leader Fellowship [1140317]
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship [1148792]
  7. Green Cities Fund -Hort Innovation Limited
  8. University of Wollongong Faculty of Social Sciences
  9. University of Wollongong Global Challenges initiative
  10. Australian Government project [GC15005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study suggests that introversion and neuroticism have a negative impact on the mental health of adolescents, especially females. Having quality green spaces nearby, such as parks, can potentially help restore their mental well-being.
Introduction: Adolescents, especially females, tend to experience poorer mental health if they are higher in introversion and neuroticism. As a result, they also may have more to gain from having quality green space (e.g. parks) nearby to enable restoration, but this remains tested. Method: Cross-sectional data on 2946 adolescents aged 16-17y were extracted from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Multilevel linear regressions assessed association between parent/caregiver green space quality perception with self-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties Scores (TDS) and internalising (e.g. anxiety) and externalising (e.g. fidgetiness) subscales. Models were weighted for representativeness, accounted for spatial clustering within postcodes, and adjusted for geographic stratum and socioeconomic confounders. This was followed by adjustment for introversion and neuroticism, and then three-way interaction terms between each trait, green space quality and sex to assess for potential effect modification. Results: Quality green spaces was associated with higher TDS (13 = 1.506; SE = 0.371), internalising (13 = 0.982; SE = 0.220) and externalising (13 = 0.518; SE = 0.234) scores (i.e. poorer mental health). Introversion was associated with higher TDS (13 = 1.416; SE = 0.089), higher internalising (13 = 1.233; SE = 0.050) and higher externalising scores (13 = 0.181; SE = 0.056). Similar associations were observed for neuroticism and TDS (13 = 2.283; SE = 0.084), internalising (13 =1.627; SE = 0.046) and externalising scores (13 = 0.656; SE = 0.056). Mean levels of introversion were similar for girls and boys (1.73 vs 1.76, p = 0.6573), but mean levels of neuroticism were notably higher in girls than boys (2.42 and 1.67, p < 0.0001). Likelihood ratio tests indicated three-way interactions improved models analysing the internalising subscale outcome only. Green space quality made no difference to associations between introversion or neuroticism and internalising scores in males. Quality green space was associated with 3.2 and 2.1 reductions in mean internalising scores among females with the highest levels of introversion or neuroticism, respectively. Conclusions: Individual differences in psychological traits may predispose some adolescents, and females especially, to restoration from green space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据