4.7 Article

Endocrine disruptors: Challenges and future directions in epidemiologic research

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111969

关键词

Epidemiology; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Human studies

资金

  1. Cancer Research Society
  2. Fonds de recherche du Qebec - Sante
  3. Ministere de l' Economie, de la Science et de l'Innovation du Quebec
  4. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Sante
  5. Institut de recherche Robert-Sauve en sante et en securite du travail (IRSST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Public concern about the impact of endocrine disrupting chemicals on human and environmental health is increasing. Epidemiologic research plays a key role in understanding the relationship between EDC exposure and health outcomes, but faces challenges related to study design, methodological choices, and result interpretation. An integrative approach involving expertise in epidemiology, exposure science, risk assessment, and toxicology is essential for adequately studying the health risks associated with EDCs and addressing their challenges.
Public concern about the impact of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) on both humans and the environment is growing steadily. Epidemiologic research provides key information towards our understanding of the relationship between environmental exposures like EDCs and human health outcomes. Intended for researchers in disciplines complementary to epidemiology, this paper highlights the importance and challenges of epidemiologic research in order to present the key elements pertaining to the design and interpretation of an epidemiologic study on EDCs. The conduct of observational studies on EDCs derives from a thoughtful research question, which will help determine the subsequent methodological choices surrounding the careful selection of the study population (including the comparison group), the adequate ascertainment of exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest, and the application of methodological and statistical concepts more specific to epidemiology. The interpretation of epidemiologic results may be arduous due to the latency occurring between EDC exposure and certain outcome (s), the complexity in capturing EDC exposure(s), and traditional methodological and statistical issues that also deserve consideration (e.g., confounding, effect modification, non-monotonic responses). Moving forward, we strongly advocate for an integrative approach of expertise in the fields of epidemiology, exposure science, risk assessment and toxicology to adequately study the health risks associated with EDCs while tackling their challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据