4.7 Article

Pubertal Bisphenol A exposure increases adult rat serum testosterone by resetting pituitary homeostasis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118764

关键词

Biological Sciences; Toxicology; Bisphenol A; Leydig cell; PI3K; AKT signaling; Testosterone; Growth hormone

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91949123]
  2. Wenzhou City Science and Technology Bureau, China [ZY2019002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that low-dose, short-term exposure to BPA during puberty can affect male reproductive function in adult rats by altering hormone levels and gene expression profiles in the pituitary and testes.
Bisphenol A (BPA) is widely used by manufacturers and in consumer products. Its release in the environment may affect male reproductive function. In this study, we examined the effect of low dose (0.1 mg/kg BW), short term exposure during puberty (PD21-35) on adult rat male reproduction. The results indicated that such exposure reset growth hormone (GH) and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) homeostasis and resulted in a significantly higher level of serum testosterone without affecting serum luteinizing hormone level. QPCR and Western blot results showed that BPA significantly up-regulated selective genes/proteins in the Leydig cell steroidogenic pathway, including steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, cytochrome P450 11A1, cytochrome P450 17A, and low-density lipoprotein receptor. RNA-Seq analysis of testicular RNAs showed that BPA significantly affected the gene profiles of multiple testicular interstitial populations without affecting germ cells. Also, GO- and KEGGanalysis suggested that IGF1-related PI3K/AKT signaling was activated, which was confirmed by the increased phosphorylation of IRS1, AKT1 and CREB. The results indicated that a low-dose, short-term BPA exposure during puberty affected the adult male rat pituitary (GH and FSH) and testis (testosterone) homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据