4.6 Article

Bacteriophage S6 requires bacterial cellulose for Erwinia amylovora infection

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 3436-3450

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15973

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_156947]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_156947] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the crucial role of bacterial cellulose in the infection of Erwinia amylovora by the podovirus S6 was demonstrated. The cellulose-targeting phage S6 degraded cellulose using its phage-encoded cellulase Gp95, but solely applying cellulose targeting phages was not effective in controlling E. amylovora.
Bacteriophages are highly selective in targeting bacteria. This selectivity relies on the specific adsorption of phages to the host cell surface. In this study, a Tn5 transposon mutant library of Erwinia amylovora, the causative agent of fire blight, was screened to identify bacterial receptors required for infection by the podovirus S6. Phage S6 was unable to infect mutants with defects in the bacterial cellulose synthase operon (bcs). The Bcs complex produces and secretes bacterial cellulose, an extracellular polysaccharide associated with bacterial biofilms. Deletion of the bcs operon or associated genes (bcsA, bcsC and bcsZ) verified the crucial role of bacterial cellulose for S6 infection. Application of the cellulose binding dye Congo Red blocked infection by S6. We demonstrate that infective S6 virions degraded cellulose and that Gp95, a phage-encoded cellulase, is involved to catalyse the reaction. In planta S6 did not significantly inhibit fire blight symptom development. Moreover, deletion of bcs genes in E. amylovora did not affect bacterial virulence in blossom infections, indicating that sole application of cellulose targeting phages is less appropriate to biologically control E. amylovora. The interplay between cellulose synthesis, host cell infection and maintenance of the host cell population is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据