4.2 Article

Iodine content of fish otoliths in species found in diverse habitats

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 351-367

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-022-01228-6

关键词

Fish otolith; Redox proxies; Iodine; Microchemistry; Trace element

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCE-1923965, OCE- 1633020, OCE- 1433719]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expansion of aquatic deoxygenation has affected the habitats and body condition of fish species. The study explores the use of I/Ca ratios in fish otoliths as a redox proxy. The results suggest that multiple factors, including habitat change and dietary source, may influence I/Ca ratios.
Expansion of aquatic deoxygenation has altered the quality and availability of habitats and worsened body condition for many fish species through past decades. Identifying complementary chemical redox proxies in fish otoliths, in addition to Mn/Ca, would strengthen the ability to identify hypoxia exposure in a diversity of aquatic habitats. I/Ca ratios have been used in marine sediments and bio-mineralized materials for reconstruction of past redox conditions. In order to explore influences from various endogenous and exogenous processes, a large data set of I/Ca ratios from cores of otoliths, including fishes from fresh, estuarine, and coastal waters across 30 species within 10 taxonomic orders, were reported with other chemical proxies (Mn/Ca and Sr/Ca) using LA-ICP-MS. Our results suggest no single abiotic factor, including redox condition and salinity derived from Mn/Ca and Sr/Ca, predicts I/Ca values, while they may be correlated for specific fish species. Iodine may be related to organic matter in the cores of otoliths for some species. Maternal transfer, habitat change, dietary source, phylogeny, and ecology may also influence I/Ca ratios. Based on these exploratory results, we suggest a range of future research directions to further evaluate the factors controlling biomineralization of otolith iodine and its utility as a redox proxy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据