4.6 Article

Inference of Molecular Regulatory Systems Using Statistical Path-Consistency Algorithm

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e24050693

关键词

molecular regulation; complex network; graphic model; path consistency; statistical inference

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11871238, 11931019, 61773401]
  2. Science Foundation of Wuhan Institute of Technology [20QD47]
  3. Foundation of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law [3173211205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a new algorithm to solve the dependence on variable order in datasets for inferring regulatory networks between genes and proteins, and successfully inferred the regulatory networks.
One of the key challenges in systems biology and molecular sciences is how to infer regulatory relationships between genes and proteins using high-throughout omics datasets. Although a wide range of methods have been designed to reverse engineer the regulatory networks, recent studies show that the inferred network may depend on the variable order in the dataset. In this work, we develop a new algorithm, called the statistical path-consistency algorithm (SPCA), to solve the problem of the dependence of variable order. This method generates a number of different variable orders using random samples, and then infers a network by using the path-consistent algorithm based on each variable order. We propose measures to determine the edge weights using the corresponding edge weights in the inferred networks, and choose the edges with the largest weights as the putative regulations between genes or proteins. The developed method is rigorously assessed by the six benchmark networks in DREAM challenges, the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway, and a cancer-specific gene regulatory network. The inferred networks are compared with those obtained by using two up-to-date inference methods. The accuracy of the inferred networks shows that the developed method is effective for discovering molecular regulatory systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据