4.7 Article

Application of multi-objective particle swarm optimization based on short-term memory and K-means clustering in multi-modal multi-objective optimization

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104866

关键词

Multi-modal multi-objective; K-means clustering; Short-term memory; Dynamic inertia weight; Elite archiving

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology of China [DMETKF2021024]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved multi-objective particle swarm optimizer, called MOPSO-SMK, to solve multi-modal multi-objective optimization problems where the same PF may correspond to multiple different PSs. By introducing short-term memory and K-means clustering, the algorithm achieves better performance compared to other three multi-objective optimization algorithms in terms of four indexes.
To solve the multi-modal multi-objective optimization problems in which the same Pareto Front (PF) may correspond to multiple different Pareto Optimal Sets (PSs), an improved multi-objective particle swarm optimizer with short-term memory and K-means clustering (MOPSO-SMK) is proposed in this paper. According to the framework of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm, the designs of updating mechanism and population maintenance mechanism are the keys to obtain the optimal solutions. As a significant influence factor of the updating mechanism, the inertia weight has been discussed in this paper. In the improved algorithm, a new update model for the value of pbest based on short-term memory is proposed. The update strategies based on K-means clustering are adopted to obtain the better gbest and elite archive. 16 multi-modal multi-objective optimization functions are used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed MOPSO-SMK. As the results show, MOPSO-SMK has more advantages in four indexes (1/PSP, 1/HV, IGDX, and IGDF) compared with other three multi-objective optimization algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据