4.7 Article

Using system dynamics to evaluate the impact of subsidy policies on green hydrogen industry in China

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112981

关键词

Hydrogen production by electrolysis; Subsidy policies; Renewable energy; Carbon dioxide emission reduction; System dynamics

资金

  1. Major Programme of National Social Science Foundation of China [21ZD110]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71922013, 71834003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper establishes a system dynamics model to analyze the impact of government subsidy policies on the development of the green hydrogen industry in China. The results show that a flexible combination subsidy policy can promote the industry's development, but the subsidy intensity should gradually decline.
This paper establishes a system dynamics model for the development of green hydrogen (GH) industry in China supported by government subsidy policies. The changes in the installed capacity, return on investment and carbon emission reduction of GH and the corresponding government expenditure are simulated under different single and combination subsidy scenarios including subsidy form, intensity, duration and decline mode. The result shows that the subsidy policies for investment, production, hydrogen-production electricity price and income tax rate will promote the development of the GH industry to varying degrees. A flexible combination subsidy policy needs to be adopted to coordinate with the development, technology and subsidy expenditure of the GH industry. Specifically, in the initial stage, 35%-40% of the initial investment-based subsidy or 30%-40% of the production-based subsidy can be employed for 5 years to ensure the GH industry's rapid development, combined with income tax rate (15%-20%) and higher hydrogen-production electricity price (0.3-0.35 yuan/ kWh), or with low hydrogen-production electricity price (0.25-0.3yuan/kWh) and 25% income tax rate. The government will then dynamically adjust the subsidy policy according to the scale, technological progress and cost, and reduce the subsidy intensity by 5%-10% every 1-2 years to make it gradually decline to the end.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据