4.7 Article

Techno-economic analysis and Monte Carlo simulation of green hydrogen production technology through various water electrolysis technologies

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115499

关键词

Hydrogen production; Water electrolysis; Economic evaluation; Levelized cost of hydrogen; Sensitivity analysis; Monte Carlo simulation method

资金

  1. Korea Gas Corporation (KOGAS) Research Institute
  2. Hydrogen Energy Innovation Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT [MSIT] ) [NRF2019M3E6A1064287]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed four different water electrolysis technologies and found that solid oxide electrolysis combined with a waste heat source (SOEC (W.H)) is the most competitive due to sensible heat energy saving and higher stack efficiency.
The green hydrogen produced by water electrolysis combined with renewable energy is inevitable for a sustainable and clean energy society. However, the green hydrogen production cost is still more expensive than fossil fuel-based methods such as steam methane reforming and it is the biggest challenge. In this study, to determine the most economical way to obtain green hydrogen, a technoeconomic analysis was performed on four different water electrolysis technologies, that is, alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), proton exchange membrane electrolysis (PEMEC), solid oxide electrolysis with electric heaters (SOEC (E.H)), and solid oxide electrolysis combined with a waste heat source (SOEC (W.H)). It is assumed that the SOEC (W.H) system is linked to the adjacent power plant and receives waste heat. The net present value calculation, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo method were performed for the 4 cases presented above. Calculated unit hydrogen production cost was 7.60, 8.55, 10.16, and 7.16 $/kg(H2) for AWE, PEMEC, SOEC (E.H), and SOEC (W.H), respectively. The analysis results show that the SOEC (W.H) has the most competitive case due to sensible heat energy saving and higher stack efficiency. Sensitivity analysis determined the most influential cost factor, and consequently, it seems necessary to reduce capital costs along with subsidizing electricity costs and tax rates to compete with gray hydrogen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据