4.7 Article

Evaluation of the CBC-ORC energy system in lunar base: Working fluid combination selection, day and night operation performance

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115445

关键词

Lunar base; Solar energy; Closed Brayton cycle; Organic Rankine cycle; Working fluid combination selection; CBC stop time

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006044, 52076051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a lunar energy composite power generation system that solves the problem of no solar radiation at night by storing heat energy during the day and using it during the night. The study shows that the combination of He-Xe and toluene performs the best among multiple working medium combinations, with a thermal efficiency of 33.82%.
The lunar energy system must be able to provide continuous power supply on the day and night. However, the moon night is as long as 14 days, and the solar power generation system can't work without solar radiation. The solution is that part of the heat in the daytime is used for storage, the other part is used for daytime power generation, and the heat stored in the daytime is used for power generation at night. Based on this, this paper proposes a closed Brayton cycle and organic Rankine cycle combined power generation system, and explores the operation performance of the composite power generation system in the whole lunar day process. The results show that the combination of He-Xe and toluene has the best performance among many working medium combinations. The thermal efficiency of the system can reach 33.82 %, and the heat exchange area of the radiator is 970.99 m(2). Combined with supercritical CO2, the thermal efficiency is increased by 5.2 % and the heat exchange area is reduced by 8.5 %. In addition, in the case of night, the Brayton cycle system stops working at 7.75 earth days, which can maximize the power generation capacity of the coupling system, with a power generation capacity of 94.8 MJ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据