4.4 Article

Evaluation of physiotherapy in a prospective cohort of early axial spondyloarthritis. Data from the DESIR cohort

期刊

JOINT BONE SPINE
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 185-190

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.05.008

关键词

Axial spondyloarthritis; Physical therapy; Treatment and epidemiology

资金

  1. Departement de la Recherche Clinique et du Developpement de l'Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris
  2. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the effect of physiotherapy on functional limitation in an observational cohort of early axial spondyloarthritis. Methods: Design: prospective population-based cohort study. Patients: 708 patients with early axial spondyloarthritis between 2007 and 2010 naive of TNF blockers. Intervention: early physiotherapy defined by at least eight supervised sessions of physical therapy during the first six months. Measurements: the primary outcome was functional improvement defined by a relative improvement of at least 20% in BASFI at six months. Secondary outcomes were improvement in BASFI at one and two years and ASAS20 response criteria at six months. Statistical analysis: a propensity score of having physiotherapy was developed and multivariate analysis using propensity score weighting were used to assess the effect of physiotherapy on outcome. Results: Overall, 166 (24%) patients had physiotherapy during the first six months. After using propensity score weighting, there was no functional improvement on the primary outcome in patients treated with early physical therapy (relative risk [IC95%]:1.15 [0.91-1.45]). No differences were observed on secondary outcomes (relative risk [IC95%]: 0.94 [0.80-1.11]). Conclusions: It seems there is no functional benefit for patients with early spondyloarthritis to be treated early by physiotherapy in daily practice, even though the efficacy of physiotherapy has been shown in several randomized controlled studies. (C) 2015 Societe francaise de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据