4.7 Article

Modeling and optimization of hybrid ground source heat pump with district heating and cooling

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112065

关键词

Ground source heat pump; District heating and cooling; Optimization; Borehole heat exchanger; Artificial neural network; Hybrid model

资金

  1. Umea Energi AB
  2. Industrial Doctoral School at Umea University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a hybrid model that accurately represents the long-term behavior of a GSHP system using analytical and artificial neural network models, as well as a method to improve the operation of a hybrid GSHP. The study on hospital buildings in northern Sweden shows that in the improved scenario, heating costs can be reduced, CO2 emissions can be decreased, while maintaining stable ground temperature.
Hybrid heating systems with ground source heat pumps (GSHP) and district heating and cooling offer flexibility in operation to both building owners and energy providers. The flexibility can be used to make the heating system more economical and environmentally friendly. However, due to the lack of suitable models that can accurately predict the long-term performance of the GSHP, there is uncertainty in their performance and concerns about the long-term stability of the ground temperature, which has limited the utilization of such hybrid heating systems. This work presents a hybrid model of a GSHP system that uses analytical and artificial neural network models to accurately represent a GSHP system's long-term behavior. A method to improve the operation of a hybrid GSHP is also presented. The method was applied to hospital buildings in northern Sweden. It was shown that in the improved case, the cost of providing heating to the building can be reduced by 64 t euro , and the CO2 emissions can be reduced by 92 tons while maintaining a stable ground temperature. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据