4.7 Article

Renewable heating solutions for buildings; a techno-economic comparative study of sewage heat recovery and Solar Borehole Thermal Energy Storage System

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111892

关键词

Solar-BTES; Sewage Heat Recovery System; Techno-economic analysis; Renewable heating solution; Alternative energy

资金

  1. Mitacs accelerate internship program
  2. Mitacs
  3. Claire Deschenes scholarship
  4. Fonds de recherche du Quebec -Nature et technologies (FRQNT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The technical feasibility, economic viability, and environmental impact of substituting conventional fuel with renewable and alternative sources for space heating and hot water purposes are examined. Two different choices, a Solar-Borehole Thermal Energy Storage System and a Sewage Heat Recovery System, are proposed to replace a natural gas-fired boiler in two residential buildings. The study finds that both proposed technologies are technically feasible and the financial viability depends on the unit cost of energy from electricity and natural gas. Additionally, the project execution can result in yearly CO2 emission reductions.
The extensive use of fossil fuels for space and water heating in buildings is raising CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. To address this concern, renewable and alternative energy sources should replace conventional energy options. This paper examines the technical feasibility, economic viability, and environmental impact of substituting conventional fuel with renewable and alternative sources for space heating and hot water purposes. Two different choices are offered to replace a natural gas-fired boiler in two residential buildings with 826 apartment units: Solar-Borehole Thermal Energy Storage System and Sewage Heat Recovery System. Solar-Borehole system couples the solar thermal collectors to boreholes, storing excess energy generated by solar collectors into the boreholes and supplying it to buildings when the energy demand is high and the solar energy is not sufficient. In a sewage system, low-grade thermal energy from the sewage beneath the building's site is upgraded and supplied to buildings via heat pumps. Arguments for and against each of the heating options are discussed. Proposed systems are designed using state-ofthe-art technology, and their capital and operating costs are quantified. Both of these newly proposed systems are compared against a natural gas heating system to determine energy cost savings. To make the study location independent, additional calculations are undertaken to compute energy cost savings for changing electricity and natural gas pricing rates. The findings show that both proposed technologies are technically possible to execute on the studied construction site. While the Solar-Borehole system outperforms Sewage Heat Recovery technology in the examined location, the financial viability of other sites is determined by the difference in the unit cost of energy from electricity and natural gas. The sewage system surpasses the Solar-Borehole system in areas where natural gas is more expensive. Additionally, project execution can result in yearly CO2 emission reductions of 1.1 million kg. This study can aid in understanding the technical and economic issues of transitioning multi-family apartment complexes from convectional heating to a renewable and alternative energy option.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据