4.7 Article

Experimental and statistical investigation of different valve lifts on HCCI combustion, performance and exhaust emissions using response surface method

期刊

ENERGY
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123184

关键词

HCCI engine; Valve lift; Response surface method; Performance; Emission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Determining the optimum running parameter is crucial for stable and efficient operation of HCCI engines. This study conducted the optimization of valve mechanisms, engine speed, lambda, and inlet air temperature using the response surface method. The results provide the recommended optimal operating conditions for HCCI engines and their corresponding performance and exhaust emission values.
To determine the optimum running parameter in HCCI engine is critical for stable and efficient operation, because misfiring, knocking and narrower operating range problems can be seen in HCCI combustion. So in the current study, the influences of valve mechanisms, engine speed, lambda, and inlet air temperature on the performance and exhaust emission of the HCCI engine and its optimization was conducted by response surface method (RSM). The responses were selected as effective torque (ET), brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC), indicated thermal efficiency (ITE), and emissions (UHC, CO, and NOx). The desirability function was used to define an optimum combination of engine operating conditions. The highest desirability function was found as 72% and achieved at 1168.82 rpm engine speed and lambda ratio of 0.971, inlet air temperature of 100.07 degrees C, and valve lift In 5.5-Ex 3.5 mm. These input variables were recommended as optimum HCCI engine operating conditions. Responses such as ET, BSFC, and ITE, were achieved at this point as 16.4 Nm, 236.936 g/kWh, and 21.55%, respectively. In addition, the optimum exhaust emission values were found to be 442.19 ppm for UHC, 2.42% for CO, and 468.964 ppm for NOx. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据