4.7 Article

Effect of components on the emulsification characteristic of glucose solution emulsified heavy fuel oil

期刊

ENERGY
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123147

关键词

Glucose; Emulsified heavy fuel oil; Stability; Droplet size distribution; Viscosity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51866002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental studies have shown that the glucose blend ratio significantly affects the stability and homogeneity of emulsified fuel, while an increase in water concentration and HLB value has a negative impact on stability. Optimal long-term stability and minimum average droplet size can be achieved under specific conditions.
Glucose, which can be obtained from the biomass directly, was added into the heavy fuel oil in the form of an aqueous solution to prepare a novel alternative emulsified fuel. The effects of different components (water, glucose and surfactant) on the droplet size distribution, the stability and the viscosity-temperature characteristics were studied experimentally. Results show that the increases in both the water concentration (0-40v/v%) and the hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) value (4.3-14.3) have the negative influence on the stability. By contrast, with the enhanced glucose blend ratio (0-40%), the stability and the homogeneity present the rising trends before they are decreased. It is worth noting that the long-term stability (85 degrees C, 30 days without separation) along with the minimum mean droplet size can be obtained at the 30% glucose blend ratio. Besides, the long-term stability cannot be not obtained at both surfactant concentration of 1% and 5%. The viscosity of the emulsion with surfactant is reduced in the range of 25-35 degrees C but increased in the range of 60-95 degrees C compared with that of emulsion without surfactant. Furthermore, there exists the quite slight change of the viscosity with the addition of glucose. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据