4.7 Article

Thermal evolution of chemical structure and mechanism of oil sands bitumen

期刊

ENERGY
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123190

关键词

Oil sands bitumen; Chemical structure evolution; Pyrolysis kinetic analysis; Pyrolysis mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the mechanism of oil sands bitumen (OSB) pyrolysis reaction through experimental analysis and model fitting. A simplified mechanistic model of chemical structure evolution during OSB pyrolysis is proposed.
Oil sands bitumen (OSB) is the key component of extracted oil sands, thus further investigation of the mechanism of OSB pyrolysis reaction would be helpful for the development and application of oil sands pyrolysis process. First, chemical structure parameters and thermogravimetric (TG) behavior of OSB were experimentally investigated by C-13 NMR spectroscopy and TG analysis, respectively, to initially evaluate the correlation between chemical structure parameters and pyrolytic behavior. Further, the ATR-FTIR spectroscopy technology was used to experimentally characterize and calculate the structural parameters of OSB at different pyrolysis final temperatures, and the main thermal evolution rules of different functional groups during the pyrolysis reaction were obtained. Based on this result and by using the model fitting method, the pyrolysis of OSB was found to be a parallel reaction. Moreover, the kinetic calculation results obtained by Straink method and distributed activated energy model method also supported this result. The correlation between chemical structure parameters and activation energy was analyzed, and it was found that the degree of aromatization Y-factor could be used to characterize the pyrolysis reaction activity. Finally, this study proposed a simplified mechanistic model of chemical structure evolution during OSB pyrolysis. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据