4.7 Article

Mathematical modelling of gasification process of sewage sludge in reactor of negative CO2 emission power plant

期刊

ENERGY
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122601

关键词

CCS; Sewage sludge; Gasification; CO2 negative power plant; Thermodynamic equilibrium

资金

  1. Norway Grants 2014-2021 via the National Center for Research and Development
  2. Applied research under the Norwegian Financial Mechanisms 2014-2021 POLNOR CCS 2019 -Development of CO2 capture solutions integrated in power and industry processes [NOR/POLNORCCS/NEGATIVE-CO2-PP/0009/2019-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel model for sewage sludge gasification modeling and compares it with experimental results. The model can accurately assess the performance of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) installations using sewage sludge as a fuel.
Sewage sludge is a residue of wastewater processing that is biologically active and consists of water, organic matter, including dead and alive pathogens, as well as organic and inorganic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals. Due to the nature of sewage sludge and its possible influence on human health and wellbeing, it is a subject of various regulations. Currently, sewage sludge is considered as biomass, according to the new Polish act on renewable energy sources of February 20, 2015 and its novel version of July 19, 2019. This study presents a novel model, along with a comparison with experimental results. The model could be used for sewage sludge gasification modelling for accurate assessment of the performance of novel concepts bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) installations, using sewage sludge as a fuel. The composition of the dry produced gas, determined experimentally, yields: XCO = 0.093, XCO2 = 0.264, XCH4 = 0.139, XCxHy = 0.035, and XH2 = 0.468. Performed modifications to the original Deringer-with-Gumz-modification gasification model allowed to obtain good agreement with the experimental results, reaching XCO = 0.071, XCO2 = 0.243, XCH4 = 0.139, XC3H8 = 0.035, and XH2 = 0.512. The main novelty in the formulas of the internal model was due to propane inclusion, which was not found in the literature before. Additionally, sulphur dioxide was applied in exchange for other sulphur components presented in the original model. Equilibrium constants were adjusted to suit the experimental model. For ease of calculation, the own code was used to iterate multiple temperatures. Included was the energy balance equation that is essential for verification. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据