4.7 Article

Spray atomization characteristics of biomass pyrolysis tar: Influence of methanol addition, temperature, and atomization pressure

期刊

ENERGY
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122534

关键词

Pyrolysis tar; Methanol addition; Spray atomization; Characteristics

资金

  1. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (ASTIP)
  2. y China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the influence of methanol addition, temperature, and atomization pressure on the spray atomization of pyrolysis tar using an experimental platform. The results showed that methanol addition was more effective than heating at temperatures below 40°C in improving the fluidity of pyrolysis tar. The addition of methanol had little effect on the spray angle, which was mainly influenced by the atomization pressure.
Pyrolysis tar, the main by-product of low-temperature biomass pyrolysis, can potentially replace fossil fuels and help achieve carbon neutrality. The efficient atomization of pyrolysis tar is a prerequisite for clean combustion. In this study, an experimental platform was built to explore the influence of methanol addition, temperature, and atomization pressure on the spray atomization of pyrolysis tar. The results indicated that methanol addition was more effective at improving the pyrolysis tar fluidity than heating at temperatures lower than 40 degrees C. There was no significant change in the composition of pyrolysis tar after adding methanol. The atomization results showed that the optimal experimental parameters were 12 wt% methanol, 80 degrees C, and an air pressure of 0.6 MPa. The addition of methanol had little effect on the spray angle, which was mainly affected by the atomization pressure. The r value was used to measure the degree of the effect of process parameters, and the degree of the effect increased with the r value. For the spray droplet size, the r values of methanol addition, temperature, and air pressure were 57.3, 9.1, and 8.8. In contrast, for the spray angle, the r values were 3.6, 2.4, and 9.8, respectively. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据