4.5 Review

State of the Art, Perspective and Obstacles of Ground-Source Heat Pump Technology in the European Building Sector: A Review

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15072685

关键词

ground source heat pump; ground coupled heat pump; energy transition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the current status and potential future developments of GSHP technology, focusing on its application in the refurbishment of existing buildings and the obstacles to its widespread adoption. The parameters characterizing borehole heat exchangers, as well as the latest developments involving refrigerants and secondary fluids, are studied. Additionally, the design and control strategies of GSHPs are discussed.
In the European Union, 40% of the overall final energy consumption is attributable to the buildings sector. A reason for such data may be found considering that the great majority of the building stock is more than 40 years old. According to the European Commission, an interesting potential lies in the refurbishment of the building sector, and heat pump technology has been recognized as one of the most cost-effective solutions to tackle the environmental issue of this sector. Regarding heat pump technology, ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs) have been proven to be the most efficient solution on equal boundary conditions. Despite this, in most EU states' markets, GSHPs hold only a small market share with respect to air-source heat pumps. In this paper, the state of art and possible future developments of GSHP technology have been reviewed together with a focus on the potential of such technology, most of all on the refurbishment of existing buildings, and on the obstacles to its spread. The state of art of borehole heat exchangers has been studied, focusing on the parameters characterizing the outside pipe and the pipe itself, i.e., pipe and grout materials. Moreover, an overview on the last developments involving refrigerants and secondary fluids is given. Finally, the design and control strategies of GSHPs have been reviewed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据