4.5 Article

Flow and Thermal Analysis of a Racing Car Braking System

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15082934

关键词

CFD; racing car; braking system; aerodynamics; conjugate heat transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The braking system of a racing car is a major design challenge. This study analyzes the flow around and inside the wheel of an F1 car with the braking system components to evaluate heat transfer after braking events. Using an actual geometry of an early 2000s F1 car, the braking system is simulated with a CFD approach. Different heat transfer phenomena are progressively added to the model to understand their effects. The study also investigates the influence of ambient pressure at different altitudes on heat transfer from braking events.
The braking system of a racing car is one of the main design challenges. The flow around and inside the wheel of an F1 car with all braking system components is analyzed in order to evaluate the heat transfer after a braking event. Very few studies have been published on this topic, mainly due to the high confidentiality level in the racing car sector. In the present work, using an actual geometry of an early 2000s F1 car, the braking system is simulated using a CFD approach. The boundary conditions for the wheel and brake system are taken from the simulation of a vehicle model with a front wing. Different heat transfer phenomena are progressively added to the model in order to understand their effects, including thermal convection only, radiation and conjugate heat transfer. Two different vehicle velocities are simulated to quantify and compare the heat removal after a braking event. The different heat transfer mechanisms have dramatic effects on the prediction of the brake cooling results, and these are quantified in order to understand the limitations of the simplified approaches. Finally, the influence of the ambient pressure at two different altitudes on the heat transfer from a braking event is studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据