4.1 Article

Health Care Use Outcomes of an Integrated Hospital-to-Home Mother-Preterm Infant Intervention

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2016.05.007

关键词

health care use; illness rates; multisensory developmental intervention; preterm infant; RCT

资金

  1. NICHD [1 R01 HD050738-01A2]
  2. NINR
  3. Harris Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare health care use from initial hospital discharge through 6 weeks corrected age in two groups of mother-preterm infant dyads: those who received an intervention, Hospital to Home: Optimizing Premature Infant's Environment (H-HOPE), and an attention control group. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Two community hospital NICUs. Participants: Mothers (n = 147) with social-environmental risk factors and their stable preterm infants. Methods: Mother-infant dyads were randomly assigned to the H-HOPE or control group. When infants reached 6 weeks corrected age, information about health care visits since their hospital discharges was collected through an interview. Results: Only half of all infants received all recommended well-child visits. Infants in H-HOPE were half as likely to have acute care episodes (illness visit to the clinic or emergency department or hospital readmission) as control infants (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.22, 0.95]). Infants of mothers with high trait anxiety were nearly 3 times more likely to have an acute care episode (OR = 2.78, 95% CI [1.05, 7.26]), and mothers who had low education levels (OR =.22, 95% CI [0.08, 0.60]) were less likely to have acute care episodes. There was a trend toward fewer acute care visits for infants whose mothers preferred an English interview (OR =.47, 95% CI [0.21, 1.06]). Conclusion: Findings emphasize the importance of reinforcing well-child visits for vulnerable preterm infants. H-HOPE, an integrated mother-infant intervention, reduces acute care episodes (visits to the clinic or emergency department or hospital readmissions) for preterm infants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据