4.5 Article

Rapid Quantitation of Coal Proximate Analysis by Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15082728

关键词

LIBS; coal; proximate analysis; PCR; ANN

资金

  1. Scientific research program of Hebei administration for market regulation [2022ZD09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the use of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy assisted by chemometric methods to predict the proximate analysis of coal. By comparing three models, it was found that principal component regression (PCR) is the most accurate and stable prediction method. It not only achieves accurate prediction but also shortens the modeling time.
Proximate analysis of coal is of great significance to ensure the safe and economic operation of coal-fired and biomass-fired power generation units. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) assisted by chemometric methods could realize the prediction of coal proximate analysis rapidly, which makes up for the shortcomings of the traditional method. In this paper, three quantitative models were proposed to predict the proximate analysis of coal, including principal component regression (PCR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and principal component analysis coupled with ANN (PCA-ANN). Three model evaluation indicators, such as the coefficient of determination (R-2), root-mean-square error of cross-validation (RMSECV), and mean square error (MSE), were applied to measure the accuracy and stability of the models. The most accurate and stable prediction of coal proximate analysis was achieved by PCR, of which the average R-2, RMSECV, and MSE values were 0.9944, 0.39%, and 0.21, respectively. Although the R-2 values of ANN and PCA-ANN were greater than 0.9, the higher RMSECV and MSE values indicated that ANN and PCA-ANN were inferior to PCR. Compared with the other two models, PCR could not only achieve accurate prediction, but also shorten the modeling time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据